Overcoming political polarisation

The majority of the population wants animals to be well cared for. I am convinced of this, despite the outcome of the vote on the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming, where (only) 37 per cent of the voting population said YES on September 25, 2022. However, the post-vote survey results revealed significant ideological divides that I had not expected.

In the self-assessment covering the left-right political orientation, approval for the initiative declined from 86 percent (far left), to over 67 percent (left), 25 percent (centre), 13 percent (right) to 6 percent (far right). Correspondingly, differences based on party preferences are consistent with this: 85 percent of respondents with a Green orientation supported the popular initiative, then approval decreases from 71 percent (Social Democrats), over 50 percent (Green Liberal Party), 19 percent (The Centre) down to 10 percent (Swiss Peoples Party) and 8 percent (Free Democratic Party). My impression is that too often in politics there is no factual debate, instead, approval or rejection depends on the political affiliation of whoever originates an initiative or raises an issue.
A proposal from the centre-right cannot expect approval of the left-green and vice versa. This dynamic poses a risk for animal protection issues to fall victim to political partisanship.

The survey following the vote on the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming proves that improvements in animal protection cannot be won with support from the left-green coalition alone. To secure a majority, it’s vital to win support from people across party lines.
The results of the Smartvote survey of candidates for the National Council and Council of States in autumn 2023 demonstrate this potential: For practically all parties, a larger proportion of those surveyed supported «stricter animal welfare regulations for the keeping of farm animals (e.g. permanent access to the outdoors)» than compared to the level of support shown for the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming; For example, 20 percent of the Swiss Peoples Party, 33 percent of the Free Democratic Party, 50 percent of the Young Centre Party and 80 percent of the Green Liberal Party candidates. This shows that the potential to garner a majority in favour of improved animal welfare measures is real. The public still knows little about current animal production and even less about the advantages and opportunities of keeping fewer animals in better conditions. These are not only advantages and opportunities for the animals, but also for our health, the environment and agriculture.

A positive first step towards new majorities is the planned alliance of organisations that supported the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming. Sentience has the opportunity to evolve into an organisation for animals that reaches out beyond ideological party politics. The target audience must be all individuals who care about animals, regardless of their political persuasion.

No comments yet

guest

Similar articles

The Chicken Check: who leads and who lags?

The Chicken Check: who leads and who lags?

Over the past month, Sentience has published four reports that examine how the country’s largest retailers – Migros, Coop, Aldi, and Lidl – measure up against the ECC. Today, we bring those findings together in a single ranking...

The Chicken Check: who leads and who lags?
It is not a question of how, it is a question of when

It is not a question of how, it is a question of when

Coop: the final retailer in our “Chicken Check”. Improvements, transparency, labels,... all of this sounds great. But how well does Coop’s practices align with the European Chicken Commitment (ECC), a scientific framework designed to reduce the...

It is not a question of how, it is a question of when
Same Aldi, different standards across borders

Same Aldi, different standards across borders

After Migros and Lidl, Aldi steps into the spotlight. Does it live up to the European Chicken Commitment (ECC), the scientific framework designed to reduce the suffering of broiler chickens?...

Same Aldi, different standards across borders
Vague promises do not protect animals, transparency does

Vague promises do not protect animals, transparency does

After examining Migros last week, Sentience is now turning the spotlight on Lidl to assess how well its practices align with the European Chicken Commitment (ECC), a scientific framework designed to reduce the suffering of broiler chickens...

Vague promises do not protect animals, transparency does
When the market leader leads, millions of lives change

When the market leader leads, millions of lives change

Across Switzerland, retailers shape animal welfare outcomes at scale. With the “Chicken Check”, we assess how Swiss retailers measure up to the standards of the European Chicken Commitment (ECC). To date, no Swiss retailer has signed the ECC...

When the market leader leads, millions of lives change
Why Politics Must Extend Beyond Our Own Species

Why Politics Must Extend Beyond Our Own Species

Why do our laws, institutions and policies still revolve mostly around one species – our own?

Why Politics Must Extend Beyond Our Own Species
When Science Meets Policy: A Milestone for Animal Sentience

When Science Meets Policy: A Milestone for Animal Sentience

The LSE is launching a pioneering Centre for Animal Sentience, led by Prof. Jonathan Birch. At Sentience, we welcome this vital step—proof that science and policy must meet to put the concept of sentience at the heart of decision-making.

When Science Meets Policy: A Milestone for Animal Sentience
In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

We are launching a new federal popular initiative demanding outdoor access for all animals in agriculture. This new initiative has the potential to shape the discourse in Switzerland for years to come.

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷