Overcoming political polarisation

The majority of the population wants animals to be well cared for. I am convinced of this, despite the outcome of the vote on the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming, where (only) 37 per cent of the voting population said YES on September 25, 2022. However, the post-vote survey results revealed significant ideological divides that I had not expected.

In the self-assessment covering the left-right political orientation, approval for the initiative declined from 86 percent (far left), to over 67 percent (left), 25 percent (centre), 13 percent (right) to 6 percent (far right). Correspondingly, differences based on party preferences are consistent with this: 85 percent of respondents with a Green orientation supported the popular initiative, then approval decreases from 71 percent (Social Democrats), over 50 percent (Green Liberal Party), 19 percent (The Centre) down to 10 percent (Swiss Peoples Party) and 8 percent (Free Democratic Party). My impression is that too often in politics there is no factual debate, instead, approval or rejection depends on the political affiliation of whoever originates an initiative or raises an issue.
A proposal from the centre-right cannot expect approval of the left-green and vice versa. This dynamic poses a risk for animal protection issues to fall victim to political partisanship.

The survey following the vote on the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming proves that improvements in animal protection cannot be won with support from the left-green coalition alone. To secure a majority, it’s vital to win support from people across party lines.
The results of the Smartvote survey of candidates for the National Council and Council of States in autumn 2023 demonstrate this potential: For practically all parties, a larger proportion of those surveyed supported «stricter animal welfare regulations for the keeping of farm animals (e.g. permanent access to the outdoors)» than compared to the level of support shown for the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming; For example, 20 percent of the Swiss Peoples Party, 33 percent of the Free Democratic Party, 50 percent of the Young Centre Party and 80 percent of the Green Liberal Party candidates. This shows that the potential to garner a majority in favour of improved animal welfare measures is real. The public still knows little about current animal production and even less about the advantages and opportunities of keeping fewer animals in better conditions. These are not only advantages and opportunities for the animals, but also for our health, the environment and agriculture.

A positive first step towards new majorities is the planned alliance of organisations that supported the Initiative to Abolish Factory Farming. Sentience has the opportunity to evolve into an organisation for animals that reaches out beyond ideological party politics. The target audience must be all individuals who care about animals, regardless of their political persuasion.

Similar articles

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

We are launching a new federal popular initiative demanding outdoor access for all animals in agriculture. This new initiative has the potential to shape the discourse in Switzerland for years to come.

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷
Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote

Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote

Recent animal welfare initiatives in Sonoma County, CA, and Switzerland highlight the resilience of grassroots efforts in challenging entrenched interests and promoting more ethical standards.

Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote
END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens

END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens

Coop, Migros, it is high time that we talk. Between the two of you, you are responsible for nearly 80% of meat sales in Switzerland. You therefore bear a critical responsibility for the alarming growth of the poultry industry. The number of...

END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens
Animal Welfare and Swiss Agricultural Policy: What Does the Population Think?

Animal Welfare and Swiss Agricultural Policy: What Does the Population Think?

When the Swiss people are polled regarding the objectives of agricultural policy, a key concern consistently arises: animal welfare. What actions can we take in response to these findings?

Animal Welfare and Swiss Agricultural Policy: What Does the Population Think?
We need a strong counterweight

We need a strong counterweight

The significant gains made by the agricultural lobby in the parliamentary elections of autumn 2023 pushed sustainable Swiss agriculture with location-adapted food production even further into the distant future.

We need a strong counterweight
A strong alliance for animals

A strong alliance for animals

In collaboration with organizations that supported the initiative to abolish factory farming last year, we devoted two days to exploring ways to enhance the well-being of animals in Swiss agriculture.

A strong alliance for animals
SDGs without food system reform are missing the elephant in the room

SDGs without food system reform are missing the elephant in the room

The link between farmed animal welfare and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is often overlooked. Many people are unwilling to accept that we need to treat ‘food animals’ differently if we want to address the climate crisis effectively.

SDGs without food system reform are missing the elephant in the room
Introducing the Protein Lab 2023

Introducing the Protein Lab 2023

We are pleased to introduce our first fully-funded project for 2023. Protein Lab comprises a series of one-day workshops where experts will come together to discuss how our food system can transition towards plant-based protein sources.

Introducing the Protein Lab 2023