Key Learnings 2022

Both of our initiatives represented landmark achievements for Sentience. They shaped the public discourse in 2022 and contributed to the slow inculcation of animal ethics into mainstream society. Yet, there is room for improvement. We would like to reflect on our shortcomings here.

Initiative to abolish factory farming

  • Our initiative text was legally correct, but the opposition were able to pick apart certain elements. Considering the high cost and resources required to launch an initiative, it was understandable that we wanted to include as many demands as possible. However, we now question whether a shorter, more targeted package of demands would have garnered more support. We will consider this for any future initiatives.
  • Sentience launched the Initiative against factory farming single-handedly. The opposition commanded resources which significantly exceeded our own. In order to have a realistic chance at the ballot box, any future initiative would likely require a substantially larger budget and campaign team.
  • The Responsible Business Initiative demonstrated how an initiative could mobilise resources with the support of a broad alliance. We should have prioritised alliance-building earlier. This would have enabled us to tap into the resources of more organisations.
  • In order to inspire the majority of the population for a cause, it is essential to highlight the urgency of the matter and exclude any room for doubt. We could have done this better. For future campaigns, we must ensure that the actual conditions in animal farming are made transparent sooner. Possibilities include a greater focus on highlighting scandals, publishing our own investigations, and doing more to attract media exposure.
  • Regional volunteer networks are very challenging to build. Here, we could have involved organisations that already have structures in place to manage regional leafleting, stand campaigns and billboards more effectively and at an earlier stage.
  • We built up a large network of influential personalities from society.However, we lacked credible ambassadors from agriculture who could more readily be trusted as experts in their field until a late stage in the campaignThe clearest take-home message from the follow-up surveys was that policy change in agriculture does not work without the producers. In the future, we need to involve stakeholders within agriculture in our campaigns at an earlier stage.

Primate Initiative

  • As part of the counter-campaign and in numerous media reports, it was repeatedly mentioned that the Initiative wanted to extend human rights to animals. We did not counteract this inaccurate narrative effectively. In reality, the Initiative would’ve had hardly any political consequences.
  • All non-human primates are currently kept by private institutions in the City of Basel and these would not have been affected if the initiative had been accepted. This  weakened the impact of the Initiative as a mindset-shifting campaign. We needed to better prepare and communicate the possible and realistic scenarios.
  • The discussion about the initiative was characterised by a high level of complexity and theory, especially with regard to legal issues in the area of ​​fundamental rights. Sentience had too little knowledge in this area to communicate credible expertise on our own. The team would need to be better connected to experts the next campaign, or to frame it according to the knowledge that we possess in-house.
  • After the defeat in Basel, we did not mount a follow-up to the campaign in order to purposefully continue the dialogue that we initiated with the aim of shifting mindsets. This was a missed opportunity.
  • Although the Basel Zoo would not have been directly affected by the initiative, it was able,with the support of the Basel pharmaceutical industry,to assume the position of victim. We should have exposed this approach as the strategic manoeuvre that it was.
  • We could have leveraged the Initiative better in order to professionalise our internal structures and substantially extend our long-term outreach.

Future campaigns need to incorporate these goals more effectively.

No comments yet

guest

Similar articles

Fish farming: the invisible crisis we can no longer ignore

Fish farming: the invisible crisis we can no longer ignore

For the World Day of the End of Fishing and Fish Farming, we are called to confront the hidden suffering of billions of fish, as well as the urgent need for a transformative approach to aquaculture.

Fish farming: the invisible crisis we can no longer ignore
2024 Annual Report

2024 Annual Report

The year 2024 marked a pivotal moment for our organisation. Despite limited human and financial resources, and thanks to the commitment of the entire team, we managed to lay solid foundations that now allow us to look forward to a motivating...

2024 Annual Report
Migros’ Decision to Weaken Animal Welfare Standards: A Step Backward for Ethics and Sustainability

Migros’ Decision to Weaken Animal Welfare Standards: A Step Backward for Ethics and Sustainability

Migros recently announced that imported meat products will not have to meet Swiss animal welfare standards anymore. This move marks a significant setback.

Migros’ Decision to Weaken Animal Welfare Standards: A Step Backward for Ethics and Sustainability
In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷

We are launching a new federal popular initiative demanding outdoor access for all animals in agriculture. This new initiative has the potential to shape the discourse in Switzerland for years to come.

In 2025, we are letting the pigs out! 🐷
In December, every donation counts twice

In December, every donation counts twice

From now until the end of December, every donation will be doubled by generous donors — up to a total of 50,000 CHF. This means 10 CHF becomes 20 CHF, and 50 CHF becomes 100 CHF.

In December, every donation counts twice
Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote

Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote

Recent animal welfare initiatives in Sonoma County, CA, and Switzerland highlight the resilience of grassroots efforts in challenging entrenched interests and promoting more ethical standards.

Sonoma County’s Measure J: Echoes of Switzerland’s Factory Farming Vote
END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens

END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens

Coop, Migros, it is high time that we talk. Between the two of you, you are responsible for nearly 80% of meat sales in Switzerland. You therefore bear a critical responsibility for the alarming growth of the poultry industry. The number of...

END preprogrammed suffering: together for Swiss broiler chickens
Logbook : the life of an intensively farmed chicken

Logbook : the life of an intensively farmed chicken

A broiler chicken’s weight increases 33 times over its short life. In Switzerland, nearly 80 million broiler chickens are slaughtered each year, 92% of which are raised in intensive aviculture. Their suffering is pre-programmed, encoded in their...

Logbook : the life of an intensively farmed chicken